| File:
  <rhipipho.htm>                                     [For
  educational purposes only]        Glossary            <Principal Natural Enemy Groups >             <Citations>             <Home> | 
 
| COLEOPTERA, Rhipiphoridae (Reitter 1911) --  <Images>
  & <Juveniles>   Description & Statistics            Adult beetles are rather striking with a markedly streamlined
  body, pectinate male antennae, but the color pattern of many species is
  variable.  Females of Macrosiagon pusillum Gerst. may be completely red or black, or the thorax may
  be of one color and the elytra and abdomen of the other.  Silvestri (1905) described the genus Rhizostylops as having certain
  characters and habits that seem to place it as an intermediate form between
  Rhipiphoridae and Strepsiptera, and the adult females bear a striking resemblance
  to those of the genera Mengenilla
  and Eoxenos of Strepsiptera.  Adult females of Rhizostylops as well as those of several species of Ripidius are apterous, degenerate and
  larviform (Clausen 1940/62).            
  All species seem to be parasitic, passing at least a portion of the
  larval period internally in the host body. 
  This adaptation is virtually unknown elsewhere in the Coleoptera.  Development is accompanied by a hypermetamorphosis
  that is comparable with that in Meloidae and certain parasitic Staphylinidae.             Most Rhipiphoridae seem to attack larvae of Hymenoptera
  in families Andrenidae, Scoliidae, Vespidae and Tiphiidae.  Those most often encountered belong to the
  genera Metoecus, Ripiphorus, and Macrosiagon.  Rather extensive
  parasitization of scoliid and tiphiid larvae in cocoons has been observed on
  several occasions.  In India, Tiphia pullivora A. & J., 28.4% of field collected cocoons yielded Macrosiagon pusillum adults. 
  Generally all representatives of the family developing on Hymenoptera
  are harmful (Clausen 1940/62).             This is a small, cosmopolitan family with over 200
  species known.  Characters include a
  serrated female antenna, male antenna pectinate or flabellate, 11-segmented
  in both sexes; humpbacked, wedge-shaped beetles; pronotum large, distinct,
  narrowed anteriorly; tarsal formula 5-5-4; elytra entire; abdomen with 5
  visible sternites, blunt at apex.  The
  maxillary palps are 4-segmented; labial palps 3-segmented; legs slender;
  trochantin absent.  In some species
  females are apterous and larviform.             All known species are solitary parasitoids during their
  immature stages.  Most attack larvae
  of Hymenoptera in the family Andrenidae, Vespidae, Tiphiidae and Scoliidae.  Some parasitize adult and nymphal
  cockroaches.  Both primary and
  hyperparasitic species are known. 
  First instar larvae are phoretic. 
  Larvae under hypermetamorphosis. 
  Cockroach parasitoids are internal, while those species parasitizing
  Hymenoptera are internal only during the 1st instar.  Adults are free-living.   Biology & Behavior            Ripidius spp.
  departs from the normal behavior for the family, both in host preferences and
  in relationships.  Ripidius pectinicornis Thbg. was originally described as early as 1808, as
  a parasitoid of Blatella germanica L. under the name of Symbius blattarum Sund. by Sundervall in 1831 (Clausen 1940).  Mature larvae were found in the bodies of
  cockroaches on a ship, and adult females were observed to lay their eggs
  abundantly.  Stamm (1935, 1936)
  extended studies on the behavior and larval forms of this species.  Schultze, cited by Clausen (1940) recorded
  rearing R. scutellaris Hell. from Blattidae in the Philippines, and R. boissyi
  Abeille is parasitic in nymphs of Ectobia
  in Europe.  The whole genus seems
  restricted to Blattidae.  It is also
  distinguished in habit from those developing on larvae of Hymenoptera, by
  passing its entire larval period within the host.  R. pectinicornis is gregarious, with 1-5
  developing in each host, while those on Hymenoptera are consistently
  solitary.             Extensive observations have been made on Metoecus paradoxus L., which is common in Europe as a parasitoid of Vespa spp. larvae.  The parasitic relationship was recognized
  early in 1864 by Westwood (cited by Clausen, 1940).  Chapman (1870, 1891, 1897) first thought this species was a
  commensal in the nest.  Murray
  (1870a,b) agreed with the conclusions of Westwood.  Rouget (1873) obtained oviposition in the laboratory and
  thought that under field conditions the eggs are laid on blossoms, foliage,
  etc., and that the young larvae are then carried to the nest by Vespa adults.  Chapman later found the much distended 1st
  instar larva, 10X their original length, within the bodies of the host
  larvae, just beneath the integument of the 4th of 5th segment.  Only a part of the 1st stage is passed
  internally, and the 2nd instar larva is found as a collar encircling the
  cervix of the host.             Reproductive capacity of Rhipiphoridae is relatively
  high, which is expected because of a high mortality in the 1st larval
  stage.  Chobaut (1891) noted that the
  female of Macrosiagon flabellatum F. lays ca. 500 eggs, and
  Silvestri recorded ca. 3,000 for R.
  inquirendus Silv.  Eggs are usually laid in clusters, with
  the site of oviposition being variable. 
  M. flabellatum lays its eggs in clusters in the soil, covering them
  lightly with earth.  jarvis (1922)
  found that M. cucullatum Macl. laid the eggs close together among the hairs on
  the undersides of the leaves of Urenia
  and Ficus.  Over 100 were found on a single leaf,
  covering an area of ca. 9-10 sq-cm.  Metoecus paradoxus lays the eggs in crevices in decaying wood.  Ripiphorus
  subdipterus Bosc. was found to
  oviposit in the blossoms of Eryngium
  (Chobaut 1906), and R. solidaginis Pierce does so in the
  green buds of goldenrod, Solidago rigida (Pierce 1904).  There are numerous adaptations correlated
  with the location of the host stages and with the habits of the host adults
  in case the latter serve as carriers of the triungulinids.  In no case were eggs found to be placed on
  or in close proximity to the host stages on which development of the larva
  occurs (Clausen 1940/62).             Of particular interest is the manner by which the
  triungulinids gain access to the host, because it involves transportation by
  some agency from the vicinity of hatching to the host larvae in their
  cells.  It is believed that the
  triungulinids themselves do not take an active search for either the host stages
  or the carrier but rather that they take up a position favorable to contact
  with a carrier and then wait for it. 
  Triungulinids of M. flabellatum attach themselves to Odynerus adults and are thus carried
  to the nest (Chobaut 1906).  Pierce
  (1904) thought that the triungulinids of R.
  solidaginis are carried by the Ripiphorus adults themselves, which
  are thought to hibernate in the holes of Epinomia.  This explanation is in view of the
  occurrence of the triungulinids on opening buds of Solidago, a plant that is not frequented by Epinomia adults.  However,
  many of them were found on the bodies of bees of various genera living in the
  Epinomia community.  Triungulinids of R. subdipterus are
  found on Eryngium blossoms and are
  thought to attach themselves to Halictus
  adults frequenting this plant (Clausen 1940/62).             Macrosaigon cucullatum is parasitic on larvae of Campsomeris spp. in Australia. 
  The wasps are external parasitoids of scarab grubs in soil.  Triungulinids of Macrosaigon are found on the foliage of certain trees and the
  problem of reaching host larvae in the soil, which are themselves parasitic
  and thus receive no attention from the parent females, is more complex than
  that facing the species mentioned previously.  Laboratory studies indicated that the triungulinids probably attach
  themselves to the Campsomeris
  females and are thus carried into the soil at the time the latter oviposit
  and that at this time they transfer to the scarab grub and await the hatching
  of the Campsomeris egg and its
  subsequent development as a larva.  One
  triungulinid was found to remain motionless on an egg on a paralyzed grub for
  3 days, during which it made no effort to pierce the chorion.  Although development is completed only on
  the mature larva in the cocoon, it is probable that the triungulinid attaches
  itself to the partially grown larva or enters its body prior to cocoon
  formation (Clausen 1940/62). 
  Triungulinids do not effect parasitization of scoliid or tiphiid
  larvae after the cocoon has been spun.             Among scoliid and tiphiid hosts of various
  Rhipiphoridae, it is evident that if the triungulinids of the parasitoid are
  carried into the soil by the females at the time of oviposition, the extent
  of parasitization of the different species will vary greatly in the same
  locality, due to diverse feeding habits of the adults.  Scoliid females feed mainly at blossoms,
  while the spring species of Tiphiidae feed almost exclusively on insect
  honeydew and the summer and autumn species mostly on the secretions from
  various nectar glands of plants.  The
  relatively high mortality of Tiphia
  pullivora previously mentioned, is
  possibly linked to a more general tendency to feed at blossoms than is shown
  by other species in the field during the same season (Clausen 1940/62).             A simple parasitic relationship in this family seems to
  exist in respect to the Ripidius
  species which attack nymphs and adults of cockroaches.  In this genus the eggs are thought to be
  laid indiscriminately in crevices, etc., and the triungulinids attach
  themselves directly to passing hosts and enter the body to develop, thus
  eliminating the requirement of a carrier.             Triungulinids of all species are equipped with a caudal
  sucker and 1-2 pairs of cerci of varying length which they use to assume an
  erect position, with the legs entirely free, while waiting to attach to
  passing insects, etc.  They are
  thought to have the jumping habit which is common to larvae of this kind.             The fee-living phase of larval life may extend over a
  considerable length of time, during which food does not seem to be
  required.  However, Pierce (1904)
  believed that the triungulinids of Ripiphorus
  solidaginis fed on the plant
  tissues or sap of Solidago soon
  after hatching.  He based this
  conclusion on (1) that they are of considerably greater size than the egg,
  and (2) that they are found only on Solidago,
  which is not frequented by host bees. 
  It was assumed that this plant was utilized in preference to others,
  in order to fulfill these food requirements. 
  A transitory plant feeding habit such as this is not in accord with
  the habits of larvae of this type, and the evidence presented does not
  definitely establish its occurrence. 
  The increase in size may possibly have been the result of imbibing moisture
  from the leaf surface (Clausen 1940).             With exception of Ripidius
  pectinicornis and Ripidius spp. which pass the entire
  larval feeding period within the cockroach host, all known species develop
  externally, having an internal phase only in the 1st stage.  Sometimes this internal period is short,
  but in M. flabellatum, entry into the Odynerus
  larva occurs during late summer, and the parasitoid larva does not emerge for
  external feeding until the following June. 
  The developmental cycle and larval habits are comparable to those of
  certain Perilampidae, in particular species with hyperparasitic habits.  Usually the host larva is not killed until
  it has completed feeding and it prepared to pupate.  The cells containing parasitized Vespa larvae and those of
  other host groups of similar habit as well are thus closed in the normal
  way.  In the case of Scoliidae and
  Tiphiidae, the cocoons are spun before death (Clausen 1940/62).             Transition from internal to external feeding has been
  observed in Macrosiagon flabellatum and Metoecus paradoxus
  (Grandi 1937).  In the former species,
  the greatly distended triungulinid, which is several hundred times as large
  by volume as when newly hatched (see Clausen, 1940 for diagrams), emerges
  through a puncture in the 3rd thoracic segment of the host, immediately casts
  it exuviae, which remains in the puncture, and then assumes the feeding
  position in which it is found as a collar around the 1st or 2nd thoracic
  segment (see Clausen, 1940 for diagram). 
  The triungulinid increases in length from 0.5 mm. at hatching to 2.5
  mm. just prior to the first molt.  The
  host larva is eventually consumed.   Life Cycle            Most species of Rhipiphoridae seem to have only one
  generation per year, which is closely correlated with the cycle of the host.  Ripiphorus
  solidaginis overwinters in the
  adult stage and lays eggs early in springtime, with the adult stage attained
  again in August (Pierce 1904). 
  However, Metoecus paradoxus lays its eggs in late
  autumn, and the fully developed embryo persists in the egg until
  springtime.  Macrosaigon flabellatum
  lays its eggs in late summer, and overwinters as 1st instar larvae within the
  body of Odynerus larvae.  M.
  pusillum is thought to have the
  same hibernation habit, for adults emerge from Tiphia cocoons during July. 
  Barber (1939) discussing observations of J. C. Bridwell on Ripiphorus sp., parasitic on Augochlora pura Say, mentioned that the triungulinids are found attached to
  the hairs of hibernating inseminated female hosts.  They overwinter in this way, on the hibernating female bee, and
  transfer to her brood cells when these are formed in spring.  R.
  solidaginis is believed to have 2
  generations annually; Ripidius pectinicornis, developing in
  cockroaches in the tropics, probably has a short cycle, with several
  generations each year (Clausen 1940/62).             In M. flabellatum and M. cucullatum, the
  incubation period i 17 and 7.5 days, respectively.  Larval feeding of Metoecus
  paradoxus covers only 12-14 days.   For detailed descriptions of immature stages of Rhipiphoridae,
  please see Clausen (1940/62).      References:   Please refer to 
  <biology.ref.htm>, [Additional references may be found at:  MELVYL
  Library]   Linsley, E. G. & J. W. MacSwain.  1951. 
  Bull. Calif. Ins. Surv. 1: 
  79-88.   Linsley, E. G., J. W. MacSwain & R. F.
  Smith.  1952.  Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 9:  291-314.   Selander, R.
  B.  1957.  Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 50:  88-103.   |